<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 100 Children&#8217;s Novels (#3)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/</link>
	<description>A School Library Journal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:56:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Teen Titles #4: Practically Paradise by Diane R. Kelly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-799455</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Teen Titles #4: Practically Paradise by Diane R. Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-799455</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 100: 2010 Picks for Best Children&#8217;s Novels (grades 3-8) : PragmaticMom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-15548</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 100: 2010 Picks for Best Children&#8217;s Novels (grades 3-8) : PragmaticMom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-15548</guid>
		<description>[...] of book. Thank you!#1 Charlotte’s Web by E.B. White#2 A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle#3 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone by J.K. Rowling#4 The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis#5 From the Mixed Up Files of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of book. Thank you!#1 Charlotte’s Web by E.B. White#2 A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle#3 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone by J.K. Rowling#4 The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis#5 From the Mixed Up Files of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rams</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>rams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>For the record, if you only come to the Barrie book as an adult, there are some aspects that feel kind of ... squelchy.  Like that kiss in the corner of Mrs. Darling&#039;s mouth that the children can never get but that Peter gets without trying. Or, more straightforwardly, Pan&#039;s comment about Tink that &quot;There&#039;s something she wants to be to me, but it isn&#039;t my mother.&quot;  (To her credit, Tink replies &quot;You silly ass.&quot;)

Ah, but those screwed-up Victorian/Edwardians sure did get good books out of their emotional stews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, if you only come to the Barrie book as an adult, there are some aspects that feel kind of &#8230; squelchy.  Like that kiss in the corner of Mrs. Darling&#8217;s mouth that the children can never get but that Peter gets without trying. Or, more straightforwardly, Pan&#8217;s comment about Tink that &#8220;There&#8217;s something she wants to be to me, but it isn&#8217;t my mother.&#8221;  (To her credit, Tink replies &#8220;You silly ass.&#8221;)</p>
<p>Ah, but those screwed-up Victorian/Edwardians sure did get good books out of their emotional stews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santiago</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>santiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 08:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>Did anyone else notice that on the cover at the very top, Harry seems to be walking into the path of the Hogwarts Express? How does he even make it to book 2, let alone 7?

BTW, I too was  wondering if Peter Pan would show up. Is this an example of Disney skewing our perceptions of the original for better or worse? I&#039;m a big fan of the Barry and Pearson books. I think it&#039;s great that they sit on our shelves right next to the original.

Lastly, does anyone still read Diana Wynne Jones and the Chrestomanci books? 
I read one awhile back and found it unappealing for some reason I still can&#039;t figure out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone else notice that on the cover at the very top, Harry seems to be walking into the path of the Hogwarts Express? How does he even make it to book 2, let alone 7?</p>
<p>BTW, I too was  wondering if Peter Pan would show up. Is this an example of Disney skewing our perceptions of the original for better or worse? I&#8217;m a big fan of the Barry and Pearson books. I think it&#8217;s great that they sit on our shelves right next to the original.</p>
<p>Lastly, does anyone still read Diana Wynne Jones and the Chrestomanci books?<br />
I read one awhile back and found it unappealing for some reason I still can&#8217;t figure out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hazel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>Hazel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>Oh boy.  Before Harry Potter, the best book for a school-for-witches obsessed kid was Mary Stuart&#039;s The Little Broomstick.  Then this book came along.  I remember thinking --wow, this world of magic feels so REAL! Any horrible things that happen have an audience to comment on them.  I realized later what I loved about it was that the magic had a whole society that made it feel important and legitimate and adult!  Such satisfaction.

I&#039;ve been waiting and waiting for Peter Pan, and I&#039;m kind of crushed to realize it probably won&#039;t appear.  Does no one else read it??!  And DaNae, J.M. Barrie wandering off the narrative was not something I ever noticed or was bothered by, even as a nine-year old.  I think half of what I loved about it was the atmosphere of Neverland, so I guess the descriptive parts were like feasts (I distinctly remember the chapter in which all the inhabitants of the island are tracking each other, and we get to see them all sneak by in a procession...). And the humour!  Captain Hook and the poisoned cake! As a kid I read it over and over again --and not just the action bits --the whole thing. No other setting tingles with the same potent magic as those woods, and Peter is such a mixture of fun and tragedy.  Plus the sword fights were.. well, epic.

Also, Mary Poppins was the book that taught me to read! :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy.  Before Harry Potter, the best book for a school-for-witches obsessed kid was Mary Stuart&#8217;s The Little Broomstick.  Then this book came along.  I remember thinking &#8211;wow, this world of magic feels so REAL! Any horrible things that happen have an audience to comment on them.  I realized later what I loved about it was that the magic had a whole society that made it feel important and legitimate and adult!  Such satisfaction.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting and waiting for Peter Pan, and I&#8217;m kind of crushed to realize it probably won&#8217;t appear.  Does no one else read it??!  And DaNae, J.M. Barrie wandering off the narrative was not something I ever noticed or was bothered by, even as a nine-year old.  I think half of what I loved about it was the atmosphere of Neverland, so I guess the descriptive parts were like feasts (I distinctly remember the chapter in which all the inhabitants of the island are tracking each other, and we get to see them all sneak by in a procession&#8230;). And the humour!  Captain Hook and the poisoned cake! As a kid I read it over and over again &#8211;and not just the action bits &#8211;the whole thing. No other setting tingles with the same potent magic as those woods, and Peter is such a mixture of fun and tragedy.  Plus the sword fights were.. well, epic.</p>
<p>Also, Mary Poppins was the book that taught me to read! <img src='http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooke Shirts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2390</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooke Shirts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2390</guid>
		<description>I second the motion on Peter Pan, DaNae -- although I thought it interesting that Mary Poppins or didn&#039;t make the list, either.  Perhaps these are instances where film/stage adaptations have trumped the novels, in terms of cultural influence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second the motion on Peter Pan, DaNae &#8212; although I thought it interesting that Mary Poppins or didn&#8217;t make the list, either.  Perhaps these are instances where film/stage adaptations have trumped the novels, in terms of cultural influence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genevieve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2391</link>
		<dc:creator>Genevieve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2391</guid>
		<description>In the Czech cover, why is the Sorting Hat topped with Rocky Horror Picture Show lips?

On a more serious note, I like that the Portuguese cover has the shower of envelopes, as that was such a magical and original part of the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Czech cover, why is the Sorting Hat topped with Rocky Horror Picture Show lips?</p>
<p>On a more serious note, I like that the Portuguese cover has the shower of envelopes, as that was such a magical and original part of the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaNae</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2392</link>
		<dc:creator>DaNae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2392</guid>
		<description>Eric thanks for the stats.  I was sure there would be a fair amount of vote spliting to nudge PS out of the top 5, but it would seem there is plenty of love to go around.

When I read the books the only character to look like his corresponding actor in my head is Snape.  I think my inner eye saw Rickman in role long befor filming began.

I didn&#039;t love Peter Pan.  Barre wrote the play first and the novel years later. He tended to wander off the narrative quite often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric thanks for the stats.  I was sure there would be a fair amount of vote spliting to nudge PS out of the top 5, but it would seem there is plenty of love to go around.</p>
<p>When I read the books the only character to look like his corresponding actor in my head is Snape.  I think my inner eye saw Rickman in role long befor filming began.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t love Peter Pan.  Barre wrote the play first and the novel years later. He tended to wander off the narrative quite often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Boaz's Ruth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2393</link>
		<dc:creator>My Boaz's Ruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2393</guid>
		<description>Z_dad, Hrms. I&#039;ve never read the Peter Pan book. Seen the movie, seen the play. But never read the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Z_dad, Hrms. I&#8217;ve never read the Peter Pan book. Seen the movie, seen the play. But never read the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-Dad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>I was shocked a few weeks ago when it dawned on me that Peter Pan wasn&#039;t going to turn up on the list.  Not making the top ten is kinda sad, but... not even cracking the top 100???  

Is everyone so familiar with the deluge of &#039;meh&#039; adaptations from over the years that people don&#039;t bother checking out the amazing original Barrie book, I wonder?  Or am I just odd for loving it so?  Or maybe it doesn&#039;t hold as much female appeal as some of these other titles?

(side note... It&#039;s probably impossible, but I&#039;d love to see how the list tallied by just counting male entries.  Might be a helpful resource for reluctant reader boys...)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was shocked a few weeks ago when it dawned on me that Peter Pan wasn&#8217;t going to turn up on the list.  Not making the top ten is kinda sad, but&#8230; not even cracking the top 100???  </p>
<p>Is everyone so familiar with the deluge of &#8216;meh&#8217; adaptations from over the years that people don&#8217;t bother checking out the amazing original Barrie book, I wonder?  Or am I just odd for loving it so?  Or maybe it doesn&#8217;t hold as much female appeal as some of these other titles?</p>
<p>(side note&#8230; It&#8217;s probably impossible, but I&#8217;d love to see how the list tallied by just counting male entries.  Might be a helpful resource for reluctant reader boys&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: blogs.slj.com @ 2013-05-21 10:04:37 -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.slj.com/afuse8production/2010/04/08/top-100-childrens-novels-3/feed/ ) in 0.07744 seconds, on May 21st, 2013 at 2:04 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 21st, 2013 at 3:04 pm UTC -->