<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And the REAL Winner is . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/</link>
	<description>A Mock Newbery Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-1998</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-1998</guid>
		<description>The preceding review is not mine — credit for it belongs to The Smoking Pen at Amazon.com — but I agree with every word of it. Alice in Verse: The Lost Rhymes of Wonderland should have at the very least been included on the Newbery Honours list. The book proves that rhyme is a valid form of poetic expression...and that it&#039;s not just for kids.

If you&#039;re a fan of Lewis Carroll&#039;s Wonderland/Looking-Glass books, skip the over-hyped, under-written Tim Burton movie, and read this book instead — you&#039;ll be thanking me later ;-)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The preceding review is not mine — credit for it belongs to The Smoking Pen at Amazon.com — but I agree with every word of it. Alice in Verse: The Lost Rhymes of Wonderland should have at the very least been included on the Newbery Honours list. The book proves that rhyme is a valid form of poetic expression&#8230;and that it&#8217;s not just for kids.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a fan of Lewis Carroll&#8217;s Wonderland/Looking-Glass books, skip the over-hyped, under-written Tim Burton movie, and read this book instead — you&#8217;ll be thanking me later <img src='http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-1999</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-1999</guid>
		<description>Alice in Verse: The Lost Rhymes of Wonderland recaptures those once thought &quot;lost dreams&quot; of childhood with crisp, fluid verse so cannily on the mark Lewis Carroll himself would have been hard-pressed to discern it from his own:

&quot;The sun was shining on the sea,
Shining with all his might:
He did his very best to make
The billows smooth and bright--
And this was odd, because it was
The middle of the night.&quot;

-- from Through the Looking-Glass (opening stanza of &quot;The Walrus &amp; the Carpenter&quot;)

&quot;The moon was shining on the sea,
So to eclipse the sun:
She did her very best to make
The billows roughly run--
And this was odd, because, of course,
The day had just begun.&quot;

-- from Alice in Verse: The Lost Rhymes of Wonderland (opening stanza of &quot;The Walrus &amp; the Carpenter Head Back&quot;)

Since the greater half of Carroll&#039;s poetry in both Wonderland and Looking-Glass was based upon popular rhymes of the day, an homage of this sort is most fitting. Yet the brilliance of The Lost Rhymes lies not only juxtaposition and homage. Like the poems of Wonderland and Looking-Glass, The Lost Rhymes are peppered with allegory and insight, from the legal sham of the Knave of Heart&#039;s trial (with the obvious collusion of the Hatter as defense counsel and the Hare as prosecutor), where the King declares:

&quot;We&#039;ve heard the charge brought by the Hare
Upon this crucial matter.
And now, before we hang this rogue,
We&#039;ll listen to the Hatter...&quot;

to the surprisingly sound advice of the Cheshire Cat:

&quot;If you really must go, then it&#039;s best you should know
That to find you need only to seek--
But in seeking and finding, you may need reminding:
Once found, is what&#039;s sought worth a peek?&quot;

to the heartfelt reminder that &quot;rhythm and rhyme are still virtues yet well worth defending.&quot;

The accompanying illustrations are exceptional, with a thoroughly fresh and imaginative take on the occupants of Wonderland, including a Caterpillar with a set of wings that would put the Wright Brothers to shame; a pair of cunning Tweedles who appear as though they&#039;ve substituted their last few Ritalin doses with a six-pack of Red Bull apiece; a Queen of Hearts who looks suspiciously like a cross between Jim Dale and Judi Dench; and a Hatter with what one can only assume to be a self-fashioned head-covering whose myriad mechanics and trappings are as mind-bogglingly mad as the machinations of the irreverent teetotaler himself.

Sharp, clever, and above all entertaining, Alice in Verse: The Lost Rhymes of Wonderland is more than just an homage to (or revisiting of) familiar material. It stands on its own merit as the definitive companion piece to Carroll&#039;s original classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice in Verse: The Lost Rhymes of Wonderland recaptures those once thought &#8220;lost dreams&#8221; of childhood with crisp, fluid verse so cannily on the mark Lewis Carroll himself would have been hard-pressed to discern it from his own:</p>
<p>&#8220;The sun was shining on the sea,<br />
Shining with all his might:<br />
He did his very best to make<br />
The billows smooth and bright&#8211;<br />
And this was odd, because it was<br />
The middle of the night.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; from Through the Looking-Glass (opening stanza of &#8220;The Walrus &#038; the Carpenter&#8221;)</p>
<p>&#8220;The moon was shining on the sea,<br />
So to eclipse the sun:<br />
She did her very best to make<br />
The billows roughly run&#8211;<br />
And this was odd, because, of course,<br />
The day had just begun.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; from Alice in Verse: The Lost Rhymes of Wonderland (opening stanza of &#8220;The Walrus &#038; the Carpenter Head Back&#8221;)</p>
<p>Since the greater half of Carroll&#8217;s poetry in both Wonderland and Looking-Glass was based upon popular rhymes of the day, an homage of this sort is most fitting. Yet the brilliance of The Lost Rhymes lies not only juxtaposition and homage. Like the poems of Wonderland and Looking-Glass, The Lost Rhymes are peppered with allegory and insight, from the legal sham of the Knave of Heart&#8217;s trial (with the obvious collusion of the Hatter as defense counsel and the Hare as prosecutor), where the King declares:</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve heard the charge brought by the Hare<br />
Upon this crucial matter.<br />
And now, before we hang this rogue,<br />
We&#8217;ll listen to the Hatter&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>to the surprisingly sound advice of the Cheshire Cat:</p>
<p>&#8220;If you really must go, then it&#8217;s best you should know<br />
That to find you need only to seek&#8211;<br />
But in seeking and finding, you may need reminding:<br />
Once found, is what&#8217;s sought worth a peek?&#8221;</p>
<p>to the heartfelt reminder that &#8220;rhythm and rhyme are still virtues yet well worth defending.&#8221;</p>
<p>The accompanying illustrations are exceptional, with a thoroughly fresh and imaginative take on the occupants of Wonderland, including a Caterpillar with a set of wings that would put the Wright Brothers to shame; a pair of cunning Tweedles who appear as though they&#8217;ve substituted their last few Ritalin doses with a six-pack of Red Bull apiece; a Queen of Hearts who looks suspiciously like a cross between Jim Dale and Judi Dench; and a Hatter with what one can only assume to be a self-fashioned head-covering whose myriad mechanics and trappings are as mind-bogglingly mad as the machinations of the irreverent teetotaler himself.</p>
<p>Sharp, clever, and above all entertaining, Alice in Verse: The Lost Rhymes of Wonderland is more than just an homage to (or revisiting of) familiar material. It stands on its own merit as the definitive companion piece to Carroll&#8217;s original classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2000</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2000</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t help wondering if &quot;Where the Mountain Meets the Moon&quot; might have won gold in a different year.  It&#039;s so simple and elegantly written and the messages are awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help wondering if &#8220;Where the Mountain Meets the Moon&#8221; might have won gold in a different year.  It&#8217;s so simple and elegantly written and the messages are awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santiago</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2001</link>
		<dc:creator>santiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2001</guid>
		<description>I loved Homer P. Figg when it came out. I&#039;d forgotten that it was from this year. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a &quot;funny&quot; book. The humor comes from the age old plotline of an innocent being thrown into the ridiculously corrupt world. So in a way, the story has been told many times before. 

I haven&#039;t read the reviews, but I read the Dunderheads.  found it amusing in its subversiveness, but I don&#039;t understand the raves for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Homer P. Figg when it came out. I&#8217;d forgotten that it was from this year. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a &#8220;funny&#8221; book. The humor comes from the age old plotline of an innocent being thrown into the ridiculously corrupt world. So in a way, the story has been told many times before. </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read the reviews, but I read the Dunderheads.  found it amusing in its subversiveness, but I don&#8217;t understand the raves for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genevieve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2002</link>
		<dc:creator>Genevieve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2002</guid>
		<description>I was very excited for WYRM and The Lion and the Mouse, and thought the Honor books were excellent choices.  I read The Mountain and the Moon last week and thought it was terrific, glad to see a Newbery Honor for a younger book; haven&#039;t read Homer P. Figg yet  (actually checked it out and the beginning didn&#039;t grab me at all, didn&#039;t end up reading it before the return date, but I&#039;ll give it another shot).  Am reading Charles and Emma now and it is terrific, so glad it&#039;s getting the recognition.  Loved Calpurnia Tate, though I saw the flaws as well.

Really disappointed Marcelo didn&#039;t get a Printz Medal or Honor - thought it was a marvelous and original book, beautifully written, with a surprising plot (not just &#039;boy on the autistic spectrum has to learn to deal with the real world&#039; - he has to deal with ethical problems that would challenge anyone, and it&#039;s actually a page-turner to see what he will do).  I&#039;m very glad it got the Schneider, but would&#039;ve liked to have seen it get the wider recognition of the Printz.

Also, I&#039;m reading Marching for Freedom (thanks to Jonathan - will get to Claudette Colvin when I come up in the library queue) and it is so well done.  I wish it could&#039;ve gotten some recognition as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very excited for WYRM and The Lion and the Mouse, and thought the Honor books were excellent choices.  I read The Mountain and the Moon last week and thought it was terrific, glad to see a Newbery Honor for a younger book; haven&#8217;t read Homer P. Figg yet  (actually checked it out and the beginning didn&#8217;t grab me at all, didn&#8217;t end up reading it before the return date, but I&#8217;ll give it another shot).  Am reading Charles and Emma now and it is terrific, so glad it&#8217;s getting the recognition.  Loved Calpurnia Tate, though I saw the flaws as well.</p>
<p>Really disappointed Marcelo didn&#8217;t get a Printz Medal or Honor &#8211; thought it was a marvelous and original book, beautifully written, with a surprising plot (not just &#8216;boy on the autistic spectrum has to learn to deal with the real world&#8217; &#8211; he has to deal with ethical problems that would challenge anyone, and it&#8217;s actually a page-turner to see what he will do).  I&#8217;m very glad it got the Schneider, but would&#8217;ve liked to have seen it get the wider recognition of the Printz.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m reading Marching for Freedom (thanks to Jonathan &#8211; will get to Claudette Colvin when I come up in the library queue) and it is so well done.  I wish it could&#8217;ve gotten some recognition as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flyboy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2003</link>
		<dc:creator>Flyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2003</guid>
		<description>I agree about Almost Astronauts as a surprise.  Good book, but there had been much talk about the presentation of the fact-- how it fit into the category--non-fiction.  What about C. Fleming or E. Partridge?  There is little question of their merit this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about Almost Astronauts as a surprise.  Good book, but there had been much talk about the presentation of the fact&#8211; how it fit into the category&#8211;non-fiction.  What about C. Fleming or E. Partridge?  There is little question of their merit this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy D.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2004</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2004</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really happy that &quot;Charles &amp; Emma&quot; got significant acclaim. And smug because I already have &quot;Going Bovine&quot; checked out of the library on my nightstand. I&#039;m just trying to decide whether to read it before or after &quot;Where the Mountain Meets the Moon&quot;, which I also checked out last week. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really happy that &#8220;Charles &#038; Emma&#8221; got significant acclaim. And smug because I already have &#8220;Going Bovine&#8221; checked out of the library on my nightstand. I&#8217;m just trying to decide whether to read it before or after &#8220;Where the Mountain Meets the Moon&#8221;, which I also checked out last week. <img src='http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy D.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2005</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2005</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really happy that &quot;Charles &amp; Emma&quot; got significant acclaim. And smug because I already have &quot;Going Bovine&quot; checked out of the library on my nightstand. I&#039;m just trying to decide whether to read it before or after &quot;Where the Mountain Meets the Moon&quot;, which I also checked out last week. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really happy that &#8220;Charles &#038; Emma&#8221; got significant acclaim. And smug because I already have &#8220;Going Bovine&#8221; checked out of the library on my nightstand. I&#8217;m just trying to decide whether to read it before or after &#8220;Where the Mountain Meets the Moon&#8221;, which I also checked out last week. <img src='http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sondy at Sonderbooks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>Sondy at Sonderbooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>Good thing PIGEON won the Carnegie, or it would have been a real downer day for Mo Willems.  Doesn&#039;t he always win something?  :)

I was disappointed MARCELO didn&#039;t win the Printz.  I haven&#039;t read any of their choices, though, and need to see what they thought was better.

I&#039;m very happy about the Newbery and Caldecott choices, though.  Only one problem with having followed it so long:  The award announcement doesn&#039;t suddenly dramatically increase my list of books to be read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing PIGEON won the Carnegie, or it would have been a real downer day for Mo Willems.  Doesn&#8217;t he always win something?  <img src='http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I was disappointed MARCELO didn&#8217;t win the Printz.  I haven&#8217;t read any of their choices, though, and need to see what they thought was better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very happy about the Newbery and Caldecott choices, though.  Only one problem with having followed it so long:  The award announcement doesn&#8217;t suddenly dramatically increase my list of books to be read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2007</link>
		<dc:creator>LR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/#comment-2007</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know when the final Notables lists will be up?  I&#039;m anxious to see what made the final cut!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know when the final Notables lists will be up?  I&#8217;m anxious to see what made the final cut!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: blogs.slj.com @ 2013-05-19 21:28:14 -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2010/01/18/and-the-real-winner-is-2/feed/ ) in 0.08488 seconds, on May 20th, 2013 at 1:28 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 20th, 2013 at 2:28 am UTC -->