Subscribe to SLJ
Nonfiction Matters
Inside Nonfiction Matters

Picture Books

Did you all see this in the Times today:   The article quotes booksellers, publishers, authors all to the effect that picture books are not selling as well these day (outside of the classics). A number of theories are suggested for why this is — price in a weak economy, parents pushing their kids ahead to Easy Readers in the hopes this will help them on standardized tests — to which I would add the vicious cycle — weaker sales, fewer books published, less experiment, fewer great new artists and authors, fewer must-have innovations; and then there is the pressure on the 32 page format — is $16.95 for one story worth it against what a parent can download or buy in paperback (of course there are paperback picture books but they are so slim and hard to sort through that that format really only benefits books people already know they want, it is not a browsing format).

The one big part that I find missing in the article is the library — I suspect the library will be the home of the picture. In part that is because libraries already have so many. The shelves are crammed with every sort of picture book. This feast for young children and their caregivers plays to the strength of picture books. The adult and child are not forced to pick one and plunk down a chunk of change. Instead they can mix, match, compare, browse, share, combine. That allows them to go slow with a favorite, read it over and over, and skim through and put down books which are not working. I suspect that the library — which will need to replace careworn picture books, and thus also keep alert for new ones, is really where that format will be kept alive.

Now what that means in terms of pricing, distribution, attention — that I’m not sure. But I see the library was where picture book will continue to be that unique format which allows artists to speak to children through adults — that glorious circuit of eye, ear, page and story.


  1. Shirley Budhos says:

    Yes, I noticed it and was shocked, but not surprised. What a great loss! Children’s early responses are visual, ad they can make up stories by looking at pictures. As for the pop up books, I still like to touch them , and I’m in my dotage, for manipulating the movable parts, pulling and inserting parts, finding surprises, and then thinking about the parts and the whole are still entertaining for me, and I’m sure for children. These tactile books also influence how children create their own work, especially when they draw, which is natural, and later when they learn about maps and illustrating their environment, etc.

    I also thought of all the artists who create these wonderful books which encourage children to draw and “to look” at shapes, colors, patterns. I could go on and on about picture books remembering those moments of discovery and “naming” with all my grandchildren.

    So, I hope that librarians don’t economize too much and resort to purchasing only “print.” In this technological age, when illustration can be done on a computer, I hope we don’t lose interest and experience in using the hand, pen, charcoal, crayon, and brush.

  2. Marc Aronson says:

    the librarians are the ones who are still holding the fort on picture books, it is the parents who are shifting to other kinds of early readers


  1. […] think has been talked about a lot (and Marc Aronson had a great summary of reasons on his School Library Journal blog) is that schools might be contributing to this shift from picture books to chapter books because of […]