<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Opportunity, and Challenge, of the Nonfiction Literacy Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/2010/10/11/the-opportunity-and-challenge-of-the-nonfiction-literacy-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/2010/10/11/the-opportunity-and-challenge-of-the-nonfiction-literacy-standard/</link>
	<description>A School Library Journal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 22:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Campbell Bartoletti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/2010/10/11/the-opportunity-and-challenge-of-the-nonfiction-literacy-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-10717</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Campbell Bartoletti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/?p=775#comment-10717</guid>
		<description>I agree, Marc. As Shirley and you point out so well, such an approach could have amazing cross implications for reading and writing -- as well as in the &quot;traditional&quot; nonfiction areas of social studies and the sciences. It&#039;s already there in the Language Arts and traditional English classrooms, where teachers use nonfiction texts as works of literature (and rightly so). I hope administrators and district supervisors are reading along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Marc. As Shirley and you point out so well, such an approach could have amazing cross implications for reading and writing &#8212; as well as in the &#8220;traditional&#8221; nonfiction areas of social studies and the sciences. It&#8217;s already there in the Language Arts and traditional English classrooms, where teachers use nonfiction texts as works of literature (and rightly so). I hope administrators and district supervisors are reading along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Aronson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/2010/10/11/the-opportunity-and-challenge-of-the-nonfiction-literacy-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-10703</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Aronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/?p=775#comment-10703</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for spreading the word to any administrators or district supervisors who may be reading along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for spreading the word to any administrators or district supervisors who may be reading along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley Budhos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/2010/10/11/the-opportunity-and-challenge-of-the-nonfiction-literacy-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-10682</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley Budhos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/?p=775#comment-10682</guid>
		<description>As a former college, high school, and middle school teacher with brief &quot;appearances&quot; in elementary school, and now retired, I see this is a 3-part challenge: One is to get teachers with different disciplines to communicate, plan, and share materials. For example, those teaching Social Studies (called history in my school days) and English (now Communication Arts) could select printed matter &amp; assignments  to encourage critical reading and thinking. 

Second, I&#039;m afraid what I&#039;ve seen in teaching the research papers or anything resembling scholarly research is truly lacking, because many teachers assume that students know how to cope with the process, such as examining the structure of the book for research, taking relevant notes, organizing the notes, writing to support a theme/hypothesis, and using writing skills/quotes/attributions, etc. As for paraphrasing, I suspect it&#039;s a lost art. Copy and paste have replaced these skills.

I used to plan the writing of  their (research) papers in steps, and devote a portion of each classroom meeting to discuss skills &amp;  techniques students had to master, In college, and often in high school, the teacher/professor is the only person to read students&#039; research papers; instead, I&#039;d devote time for students to exchange their papers, work in teams or groups to share their mighty effort.

As for teachers&#039;  exchange of units of books, years ago when Norbert Frye published a unique collection  containing different periods in history/literature, I recommended purchasing these soft covered books. The school librarian, as well as the chairperson recommended using 1 of the books, which was very sad, for a year&#039;s work could have been based on Frye&#039;s resources, and they would have encouraged students to explore related works by other writers.

As for working with Social Studies teachers to strengthen students writing skills, their attitude was that they had limited time to cover their curriculum, and, of course, inevitably, the essays and term papers students wrote were discouraging. And, as you wrote, non-fiction boks collected dust, because students focused on required reading &amp;, taking tests. 

On another note: To have publishers/distributors respond to classroom needs, teachers must take the initiative. Long before post colonial literature was published in the US (and I had purchased many, of course, in London where Heinemann prospered), I&#039;d visit, write, and &quot;nag&quot; those who made decisions about school purchases, In NY at the where  I taught I&#039;d attend book promotions by publishers/distributors and speak to representatives alerting them that there was a market for paperbacks by Achebe, and others, and I&#039;d even show them copies printed overseas. I&#039;d also bring  a list I recommended for high school students. As a result, I introduced a course  on such writing This was in the 80s), and again, I provided my students, and Social Studies&#039; colleagues with non-fiction references. 

Third: Using magazines is essential, and asking students to bring in specific magazines (for non-fiction purposes) would make for interesting dialogues. Don&#039;t some news magazines offer special rates for teachers and students/ Keeping copies visible in the classroom means that students would realize their importance, especially when printed reports of an event were compared.

Now, all that can be accomplished by using computers, for all the information and aids are there and it takes a few people to pull it together, as you suggest. Urging a publisher or several publishers to work towards &quot;increasing business&quot; by providing recommended groups of books for classroom use is the way to go. But, those working at schools who have the power and responsibility to purchase books/supplies must be included in this endeavor. Spread the word..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former college, high school, and middle school teacher with brief &#8220;appearances&#8221; in elementary school, and now retired, I see this is a 3-part challenge: One is to get teachers with different disciplines to communicate, plan, and share materials. For example, those teaching Social Studies (called history in my school days) and English (now Communication Arts) could select printed matter &amp; assignments  to encourage critical reading and thinking. </p>
<p>Second, I&#8217;m afraid what I&#8217;ve seen in teaching the research papers or anything resembling scholarly research is truly lacking, because many teachers assume that students know how to cope with the process, such as examining the structure of the book for research, taking relevant notes, organizing the notes, writing to support a theme/hypothesis, and using writing skills/quotes/attributions, etc. As for paraphrasing, I suspect it&#8217;s a lost art. Copy and paste have replaced these skills.</p>
<p>I used to plan the writing of  their (research) papers in steps, and devote a portion of each classroom meeting to discuss skills &amp;  techniques students had to master, In college, and often in high school, the teacher/professor is the only person to read students&#8217; research papers; instead, I&#8217;d devote time for students to exchange their papers, work in teams or groups to share their mighty effort.</p>
<p>As for teachers&#8217;  exchange of units of books, years ago when Norbert Frye published a unique collection  containing different periods in history/literature, I recommended purchasing these soft covered books. The school librarian, as well as the chairperson recommended using 1 of the books, which was very sad, for a year&#8217;s work could have been based on Frye&#8217;s resources, and they would have encouraged students to explore related works by other writers.</p>
<p>As for working with Social Studies teachers to strengthen students writing skills, their attitude was that they had limited time to cover their curriculum, and, of course, inevitably, the essays and term papers students wrote were discouraging. And, as you wrote, non-fiction boks collected dust, because students focused on required reading &amp;, taking tests. </p>
<p>On another note: To have publishers/distributors respond to classroom needs, teachers must take the initiative. Long before post colonial literature was published in the US (and I had purchased many, of course, in London where Heinemann prospered), I&#8217;d visit, write, and &#8220;nag&#8221; those who made decisions about school purchases, In NY at the where  I taught I&#8217;d attend book promotions by publishers/distributors and speak to representatives alerting them that there was a market for paperbacks by Achebe, and others, and I&#8217;d even show them copies printed overseas. I&#8217;d also bring  a list I recommended for high school students. As a result, I introduced a course  on such writing This was in the 80s), and again, I provided my students, and Social Studies&#8217; colleagues with non-fiction references. </p>
<p>Third: Using magazines is essential, and asking students to bring in specific magazines (for non-fiction purposes) would make for interesting dialogues. Don&#8217;t some news magazines offer special rates for teachers and students/ Keeping copies visible in the classroom means that students would realize their importance, especially when printed reports of an event were compared.</p>
<p>Now, all that can be accomplished by using computers, for all the information and aids are there and it takes a few people to pull it together, as you suggest. Urging a publisher or several publishers to work towards &#8220;increasing business&#8221; by providing recommended groups of books for classroom use is the way to go. But, those working at schools who have the power and responsibility to purchase books/supplies must be included in this endeavor. Spread the word..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Aronson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/2010/10/11/the-opportunity-and-challenge-of-the-nonfiction-literacy-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-10679</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Aronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/?p=775#comment-10679</guid>
		<description>that is what history is -- that is what it must be -- different ways to questioning, figuring out, making sense of, interpreting who we are and how we got that way -- what could be more exciting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is what history is &#8212; that is what it must be &#8212; different ways to questioning, figuring out, making sense of, interpreting who we are and how we got that way &#8212; what could be more exciting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/2010/10/11/the-opportunity-and-challenge-of-the-nonfiction-literacy-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-10677</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/?p=775#comment-10677</guid>
		<description>Wow!  What an exciting vision for teaching history. Looking through different lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  What an exciting vision for teaching history. Looking through different lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Aronson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/2010/10/11/the-opportunity-and-challenge-of-the-nonfiction-literacy-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-10670</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Aronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/?p=775#comment-10670</guid>
		<description>I have heard of teachers doing something like that -- with the subtle idea that the different books are at slightly different reading levels, so the whole class can read about a subject, but in books that present different reading challenges. But of course that then leans towards the Lexile, while your idea has the appeal of showing different POV, different approaches, in how the authors treat the subjects. That points to another issue -- in a way a library can assume it has a subject &quot;covered&quot; if it has a book on it. But you are pointing to just the opposite -- the library needs a range of books that look at a subject in different ways, through different lenses, with different authorial views. &quot;Coverage&quot; -- is not a list of facts -- databases can do that. Rather it is opening up that area to the debate, argument, and expression of differing views by differing authors -- how great would that be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard of teachers doing something like that &#8212; with the subtle idea that the different books are at slightly different reading levels, so the whole class can read about a subject, but in books that present different reading challenges. But of course that then leans towards the Lexile, while your idea has the appeal of showing different POV, different approaches, in how the authors treat the subjects. That points to another issue &#8212; in a way a library can assume it has a subject &#8220;covered&#8221; if it has a book on it. But you are pointing to just the opposite &#8212; the library needs a range of books that look at a subject in different ways, through different lenses, with different authorial views. &#8220;Coverage&#8221; &#8212; is not a list of facts &#8212; databases can do that. Rather it is opening up that area to the debate, argument, and expression of differing views by differing authors &#8212; how great would that be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Campbell Bartoletti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/2010/10/11/the-opportunity-and-challenge-of-the-nonfiction-literacy-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-10665</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Campbell Bartoletti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/?p=775#comment-10665</guid>
		<description>Marc, this is a brilliant idea! And it makes me wonder: what would happen if a classroom set consisted of  multiple copies of, say, three DIFFERENT books by three different authors on the same subject/theme? ( It&#039;s similar to what I did when I was in the 8th-grade classroom. It was great fun to lead a whole class discussion on a theme, despite the different books/authors and fascinating to read the essays.) --Susan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, this is a brilliant idea! And it makes me wonder: what would happen if a classroom set consisted of  multiple copies of, say, three DIFFERENT books by three different authors on the same subject/theme? ( It&#8217;s similar to what I did when I was in the 8th-grade classroom. It was great fun to lead a whole class discussion on a theme, despite the different books/authors and fascinating to read the essays.) &#8211;Susan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: blogs.slj.com @ 2013-05-20 05:36:07 -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.slj.com/nonfictionmatters/2010/10/11/the-opportunity-and-challenge-of-the-nonfiction-literacy-standard/feed/ ) in 0.10394 seconds, on May 20th, 2013 at 9:36 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 20th, 2013 at 10:36 am UTC -->