<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comfort versus Processing Ability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.slj.com/practicallyparadise/2011/11/19/comfort-versus-processing-ability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.slj.com/practicallyparadise/2011/11/19/comfort-versus-processing-ability/</link>
	<description>A School Library Journal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:58:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Weisser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/practicallyparadise/2011/11/19/comfort-versus-processing-ability/#comment-62786</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Weisser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/practicallyparadise/?p=2393#comment-62786</guid>
		<description>For the technology aspect of an e-reader, I still prefer the iPad. However, the Nook also provides Internet access for a more reasonable price. I am interested in the new Kindle to see if it beats the Nook in technology.

For access to books, both the Nook and iPad allow for access to different formats but I feel the iPad may still be ahead of the game. As far as the KIndle? We will see.

Comfort? I am more comfortable reading a printed book. I enjoy holding it in my hands. I like not having to worry about battery life or access to electricity. My books weigh less than an iPad. My eyes are less tired after reading a book (text) than reading en ebook. 

The big draw for an ereader is being able to &quot;carry&quot; more than one book at a time and have access to e-mail, apps, and other technology. I also have a Droid and I can do all of the above on it so having a separate ereader may not be necessary. The problem with using the phone is not with the phone but with my aging eyes! I am already wearing reading glasses and reading a book on a 2 by 4 inch screen is taxing. Although, in a pinch the Droid is awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the technology aspect of an e-reader, I still prefer the iPad. However, the Nook also provides Internet access for a more reasonable price. I am interested in the new Kindle to see if it beats the Nook in technology.</p>
<p>For access to books, both the Nook and iPad allow for access to different formats but I feel the iPad may still be ahead of the game. As far as the KIndle? We will see.</p>
<p>Comfort? I am more comfortable reading a printed book. I enjoy holding it in my hands. I like not having to worry about battery life or access to electricity. My books weigh less than an iPad. My eyes are less tired after reading a book (text) than reading en ebook. </p>
<p>The big draw for an ereader is being able to &#8220;carry&#8221; more than one book at a time and have access to e-mail, apps, and other technology. I also have a Droid and I can do all of the above on it so having a separate ereader may not be necessary. The problem with using the phone is not with the phone but with my aging eyes! I am already wearing reading glasses and reading a book on a 2 by 4 inch screen is taxing. Although, in a pinch the Droid is awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: blogs.slj.com @ 2013-05-26 01:53:57 -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.slj.com/practicallyparadise/2011/11/19/comfort-versus-processing-ability/feed/ ) in 0.06561 seconds, on May 26th, 2013 at 5:53 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 26th, 2013 at 6:53 am UTC -->