<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Are We Doing Here?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/09/04/statement-of-purpose-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/09/04/statement-of-purpose-redux/</link>
	<description>by Karyn Silverman and Sarah Couri</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:03:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Fama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/09/04/statement-of-purpose-redux/#comment-7446</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Fama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1220#comment-7446</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/06/10/what-weve-been-reading-not-much/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s &lt;/a&gt;where you might have read the disparaging comments about lack of Printz-worthy titles, Jen J. (Congratulations on your wedding! Woot!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/06/10/what-weve-been-reading-not-much/" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s </a>where you might have read the disparaging comments about lack of Printz-worthy titles, Jen J. (Congratulations on your wedding! Woot!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen J. (Formerly Jen B.)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/09/04/statement-of-purpose-redux/#comment-7361</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen J. (Formerly Jen B.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1220#comment-7361</guid>
		<description>I remember earlier this season somebody remarking that they hadn&#039;t read anything that really stood out and said &quot;I am the Printz!&quot; to them. I&#039;ve just finished updating my star spreadsheet (I know they&#039;re doing The Stars So Far over at Shelf Talker, but I like having my own data that I can manipulate about) with all the August journals and what&#039;s interesting is that, in terms of stars at least, we seem to be well ahead of last year.

Last year for the entire year, there were only 2 titles that got 6 stars. This year, we&#039;re already at 5. Now, two of those are picture books that I think we can call ineligible by audience, but the other three are Code Name Verity, The Fault in Our Stars, and Seraphina - all easily eligible.

5 star books there were 11 total last year and we&#039;re only at 4 this year (with two picture books again leaving The Brides of Rollrock Island and Moonbird by Hoose which is on the lower edge of the age range, but still solidly there).

4 star books however show 34 total for the entire year last year, but we&#039;re already at 35 for this year. Of those 35, 15 or 16 are probably in the age range. 

Looks like a good year for stars. I&#039;m interested to hear if people still feel like there&#039;s not so much out there Printz-wise or if things have moved up in people&#039;s estimation since whenever that comment was made (I looked for it, but could not find it - I hope I didn&#039;t imagine it!). Numbers of course are subject to any errors I might have made and this is all keeping in mind the discussion we&#039;ve had of stars vs. Printz and the little to no correlation between them, but since we&#039;re still using the 3 star rule for auto-contenders I thought this might be of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember earlier this season somebody remarking that they hadn&#8217;t read anything that really stood out and said &#8220;I am the Printz!&#8221; to them. I&#8217;ve just finished updating my star spreadsheet (I know they&#8217;re doing The Stars So Far over at Shelf Talker, but I like having my own data that I can manipulate about) with all the August journals and what&#8217;s interesting is that, in terms of stars at least, we seem to be well ahead of last year.</p>
<p>Last year for the entire year, there were only 2 titles that got 6 stars. This year, we&#8217;re already at 5. Now, two of those are picture books that I think we can call ineligible by audience, but the other three are Code Name Verity, The Fault in Our Stars, and Seraphina &#8211; all easily eligible.</p>
<p>5 star books there were 11 total last year and we&#8217;re only at 4 this year (with two picture books again leaving The Brides of Rollrock Island and Moonbird by Hoose which is on the lower edge of the age range, but still solidly there).</p>
<p>4 star books however show 34 total for the entire year last year, but we&#8217;re already at 35 for this year. Of those 35, 15 or 16 are probably in the age range. </p>
<p>Looks like a good year for stars. I&#8217;m interested to hear if people still feel like there&#8217;s not so much out there Printz-wise or if things have moved up in people&#8217;s estimation since whenever that comment was made (I looked for it, but could not find it &#8211; I hope I didn&#8217;t imagine it!). Numbers of course are subject to any errors I might have made and this is all keeping in mind the discussion we&#8217;ve had of stars vs. Printz and the little to no correlation between them, but since we&#8217;re still using the 3 star rule for auto-contenders I thought this might be of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: blogs.slj.com @ 2013-05-24 01:15:19 -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/09/04/statement-of-purpose-redux/feed/ ) in 0.06437 seconds, on May 24th, 2013 at 5:15 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 24th, 2013 at 6:15 am UTC -->