<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gone Fishin&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/10/04/gone-fishin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/10/04/gone-fishin/</link>
	<description>by Karyn Silverman and Sarah Couri</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:03:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Flowers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/10/04/gone-fishin/#comment-8321</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Flowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1423#comment-8321</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say I remember much about this one, but what I do recall is that I find Woolston&#039;s writing (in this one and FREAK OBSERVER) to be strangely hermetic - it just all seems very calculated and dry. That doesn&#039;t necessarily have much to do with the Printz, but it does mean that I&#039;m not planning on rereading it.

OTOH, I do remember the turn around of having Odd&#039;s letter&#039;s at the end, and I thought that was a pretty brilliant trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say I remember much about this one, but what I do recall is that I find Woolston&#8217;s writing (in this one and FREAK OBSERVER) to be strangely hermetic &#8211; it just all seems very calculated and dry. That doesn&#8217;t necessarily have much to do with the Printz, but it does mean that I&#8217;m not planning on rereading it.</p>
<p>OTOH, I do remember the turn around of having Odd&#8217;s letter&#8217;s at the end, and I thought that was a pretty brilliant trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Karre</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/10/04/gone-fishin/#comment-8319</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Karre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1423#comment-8319</guid>
		<description>Head+desk on &quot;Necco.&quot; Making a correction in the reprint file now. Thanks for the very thoughtful review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Head+desk on &#8220;Necco.&#8221; Making a correction in the reprint file now. Thanks for the very thoughtful review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/10/04/gone-fishin/#comment-8318</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1423#comment-8318</guid>
		<description>Let me add: I could not stand Mom-B even before she dropped Polly, but that&#039;s also a whole other issue. 

I&#039;ll have to mull over what you&#039;re saying about Polly &amp; perhaps the need to prove her worth about being nice. I mostly saw a single child, getting pretty much what she wants easily, including Bridger and grades and her future. Let me revisit some parts of the book. Keeping in mind, of course, who is telling the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me add: I could not stand Mom-B even before she dropped Polly, but that&#8217;s also a whole other issue. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to mull over what you&#8217;re saying about Polly &amp; perhaps the need to prove her worth about being nice. I mostly saw a single child, getting pretty much what she wants easily, including Bridger and grades and her future. Let me revisit some parts of the book. Keeping in mind, of course, who is telling the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karyn Silverman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/10/04/gone-fishin/#comment-8316</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyn Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1423#comment-8316</guid>
		<description>I barely even mentioned Bridger because I don&#039;t think he&#039;s important at all except as an emblem of the past Polly leaves behind in the course of this journey; she lets go of the perfect future they had planned, and acknowledges that it was never her plan anyway, and owns her whole self, including the bits that Bridger and Mom-B would not have appreciated. 

But I also don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to Polly to say she was never tested. Her life hasn&#039;t been anything like the hell of Odd&#039;s -- and I think Woolston does a great job of just dropping in the bits that add up, frankly, to a pretty unhappy childhood (with a nice side of abuse). But Polly&#039;s got some serious baggage long before the MRSA -- witness the emotional conflict about her birth, the ambivalence about looking like her father, who isn&#039;t actually her biological relative, thanks to her mother&#039;s selection of donor (not to mention the fact that she likes him better and is clearly more like him than she is like her mother), the sense of herself as a murderer because the second egg failed to thrive, and the need, the pathological need, to be nice that has shaped her entire life before MRSA. I actually think she&#039;s been deeply unhappy for a long time, and boxed in tightly, and if she had grown up and married Bridger I think she would have eventually exploded in some way.

The depth of characterization is marvelous and what makes this book a potential shortlist contenda in my eyes; it&#039;s the other bits that surround that central facet of the book that make me doubt. Including the fact that Bridger really is just a vehicle for growth and illumination of Polly, but that&#039;s a nothing issue, really, compared to the structural flaw and my concerns about anvilicious (thanks, Liz!) symbolism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I barely even mentioned Bridger because I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s important at all except as an emblem of the past Polly leaves behind in the course of this journey; she lets go of the perfect future they had planned, and acknowledges that it was never her plan anyway, and owns her whole self, including the bits that Bridger and Mom-B would not have appreciated. </p>
<p>But I also don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to Polly to say she was never tested. Her life hasn&#8217;t been anything like the hell of Odd&#8217;s &#8212; and I think Woolston does a great job of just dropping in the bits that add up, frankly, to a pretty unhappy childhood (with a nice side of abuse). But Polly&#8217;s got some serious baggage long before the MRSA &#8212; witness the emotional conflict about her birth, the ambivalence about looking like her father, who isn&#8217;t actually her biological relative, thanks to her mother&#8217;s selection of donor (not to mention the fact that she likes him better and is clearly more like him than she is like her mother), the sense of herself as a murderer because the second egg failed to thrive, and the need, the pathological need, to be nice that has shaped her entire life before MRSA. I actually think she&#8217;s been deeply unhappy for a long time, and boxed in tightly, and if she had grown up and married Bridger I think she would have eventually exploded in some way.</p>
<p>The depth of characterization is marvelous and what makes this book a potential shortlist contenda in my eyes; it&#8217;s the other bits that surround that central facet of the book that make me doubt. Including the fact that Bridger really is just a vehicle for growth and illumination of Polly, but that&#8217;s a nothing issue, really, compared to the structural flaw and my concerns about anvilicious (thanks, Liz!) symbolism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/10/04/gone-fishin/#comment-8313</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1423#comment-8313</guid>
		<description>Oh. One more thing. And I&#039;ll plug my review, also: http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/2012/04/18/review-catch-and-release/

I don&#039;t think Bridger or his parents are that bad, TBH. I felt they were simply people who were never tested -- what Polly would have become had this not happened. Some people seem to lead such charmed lives, and it seems if something doesn&#039;t happen to them by a certain point, they, like his mother, become hardened to those who are no longer so lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. One more thing. And I&#8217;ll plug my review, also: <a href="http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/2012/04/18/review-catch-and-release/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/2012/04/18/review-catch-and-release/</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Bridger or his parents are that bad, TBH. I felt they were simply people who were never tested &#8212; what Polly would have become had this not happened. Some people seem to lead such charmed lives, and it seems if something doesn&#8217;t happen to them by a certain point, they, like his mother, become hardened to those who are no longer so lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/10/04/gone-fishin/#comment-8311</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1423#comment-8311</guid>
		<description>Whether or not one reads thru the Printz lens (and rereads and hashes it out) makes such a difference. For this book, I didn&#039;t notice all the eyes; I did buy Polly, from the beginning, as a girl whose life was easy who now loses it all and so changes. So it will be a committee question -- does my not noticing mean they are not &quot;too much&quot; or could another argue persuasively that they were too anvilicious?

Oh, Jasper Jones: the first read I did I put it down. The second read, I ignored the &quot;mystery&quot; b/c I wasn&#039;t a fan (can i just say I&#039;m a bit tired of that story line in books), and concentrated on other elements and fell for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not one reads thru the Printz lens (and rereads and hashes it out) makes such a difference. For this book, I didn&#8217;t notice all the eyes; I did buy Polly, from the beginning, as a girl whose life was easy who now loses it all and so changes. So it will be a committee question &#8212; does my not noticing mean they are not &#8220;too much&#8221; or could another argue persuasively that they were too anvilicious?</p>
<p>Oh, Jasper Jones: the first read I did I put it down. The second read, I ignored the &#8220;mystery&#8221; b/c I wasn&#8217;t a fan (can i just say I&#8217;m a bit tired of that story line in books), and concentrated on other elements and fell for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: blogs.slj.com @ 2013-05-18 12:10:08 -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/10/04/gone-fishin/feed/ ) in 0.08597 seconds, on May 18th, 2013 at 4:10 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 18th, 2013 at 5:10 pm UTC -->