<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lists, Lists, Lists!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/11/29/lists-lists-lists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/11/29/lists-lists-lists/</link>
	<description>by Karyn Silverman and Sarah Couri</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:03:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hunt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/11/29/lists-lists-lists/#comment-10728</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1780#comment-10728</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I understand why we each only get one nomination, especially when we&#039;re going to cut the list down further before voting.  We have everybody&#039;s top pick, but what if there&#039;s a book that would have made everybody&#039;s top five, but nobody nominated it?  I&#039;m only willing to vote in the straw poll for half of the ten titles that are allotted to me, so it&#039;s frustrating that I can&#039;t put forward MOONBIRD or TITANIC or DYING TO KNOW YOU or A CONFUSION OF PRINCES or . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I understand why we each only get one nomination, especially when we&#8217;re going to cut the list down further before voting.  We have everybody&#8217;s top pick, but what if there&#8217;s a book that would have made everybody&#8217;s top five, but nobody nominated it?  I&#8217;m only willing to vote in the straw poll for half of the ten titles that are allotted to me, so it&#8217;s frustrating that I can&#8217;t put forward MOONBIRD or TITANIC or DYING TO KNOW YOU or A CONFUSION OF PRINCES or . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karyn Silverman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/11/29/lists-lists-lists/#comment-10723</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyn Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1780#comment-10723</guid>
		<description>I am surprised by how few surprises there are on the list -- a lot of consensus seems to be a hallmark of this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised by how few surprises there are on the list &#8212; a lot of consensus seems to be a hallmark of this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/11/29/lists-lists-lists/#comment-10722</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1780#comment-10722</guid>
		<description>But now we have to narrow it down to TEN? Just TEN for the shortlist? Maybe ten plus the four six-starred auto-forwards? (Clearly I am in the &quot;bargaining&quot; stage of grief for the books I love which will get cut.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But now we have to narrow it down to TEN? Just TEN for the shortlist? Maybe ten plus the four six-starred auto-forwards? (Clearly I am in the &#8220;bargaining&#8221; stage of grief for the books I love which will get cut.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Flowers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/11/29/lists-lists-lists/#comment-10721</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Flowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/printzblog/?p=1780#comment-10721</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sad for TITANIC, WE&#039;VE GOT A JOB, and MONSTROUS BEAUTY. But otherwise, a really excellent list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sad for TITANIC, WE&#8217;VE GOT A JOB, and MONSTROUS BEAUTY. But otherwise, a really excellent list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: blogs.slj.com @ 2013-05-22 06:24:48 -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.slj.com/printzblog/2012/11/29/lists-lists-lists/feed/ ) in 0.07945 seconds, on May 22nd, 2013 at 10:24 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2013 at 11:24 am UTC -->