<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Jasper Jones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/2012/08/21/review-jasper-jones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/2012/08/21/review-jasper-jones/</link>
	<description>by Elizabeth Burns</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/2012/08/21/review-jasper-jones/#comment-200195</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/?p=4668#comment-200195</guid>
		<description>TK, really? Now I want to know what was more cricket because it seemed pretty crickety. And Now I&#039;m reminded of the only other book I can remember reading that had significant cricket mentions: LIFE THE UNIVERSE AND EVERYTHING by Adams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TK, really? Now I want to know what was more cricket because it seemed pretty crickety. And Now I&#8217;m reminded of the only other book I can remember reading that had significant cricket mentions: LIFE THE UNIVERSE AND EVERYTHING by Adams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/2012/08/21/review-jasper-jones/#comment-200186</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/?p=4668#comment-200186</guid>
		<description>Craig Silvey told us on the Printz committee that the Australian version contains more cricket, and his US editor trimmed some, for the sake of American readers :-) Which pained him initially, but he agreed was the right decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig Silvey told us on the Printz committee that the Australian version contains more cricket, and his US editor trimmed some, for the sake of American readers <img src='http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Which pained him initially, but he agreed was the right decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/2012/08/21/review-jasper-jones/#comment-200178</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/?p=4668#comment-200178</guid>
		<description>Jen, exactly! I cannot believe I had such a turnaround on this. . . . It just, well, haunts the reader. And I&#039;m glad that the publisher didn&#039;t say &quot;Americans won&#039;t get cricket&quot; and kept it in. I don&#039;t get cricket, but I got that scene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jen, exactly! I cannot believe I had such a turnaround on this. . . . It just, well, haunts the reader. And I&#8217;m glad that the publisher didn&#8217;t say &#8220;Americans won&#8217;t get cricket&#8221; and kept it in. I don&#8217;t get cricket, but I got that scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen J. (Formerly Jen B.)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/2012/08/21/review-jasper-jones/#comment-200071</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen J. (Formerly Jen B.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.slj.com/teacozy/?p=4668#comment-200071</guid>
		<description>When I finished reading this, I thought I didn&#039;t like it that much. I admired the craft in the writing, but don&#039;t typically read for literary writing - I&#039;m much more likely to fall into or for a book for almost anything else - plot or character or setting - not that Jasper Jones didn&#039;t have those things, but they weren&#039;t what I most associated with it. I was amazed to find it just kept sticking with me and making me think about it, and ended up changing my rating on Goodreads and then when I made my list of top 10 books from 2011 (from the limited 2011 titles I had read of course), there it was again. I even think I&#039;ll read it again sometime which I didn&#039;t think originally - I&#039;d love to do this title with a book club. And I also particularly noticed the cricket scene - I am not a sports person, I know nothing about cricket, but I was in that scene 100%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I finished reading this, I thought I didn&#8217;t like it that much. I admired the craft in the writing, but don&#8217;t typically read for literary writing &#8211; I&#8217;m much more likely to fall into or for a book for almost anything else &#8211; plot or character or setting &#8211; not that Jasper Jones didn&#8217;t have those things, but they weren&#8217;t what I most associated with it. I was amazed to find it just kept sticking with me and making me think about it, and ended up changing my rating on Goodreads and then when I made my list of top 10 books from 2011 (from the limited 2011 titles I had read of course), there it was again. I even think I&#8217;ll read it again sometime which I didn&#8217;t think originally &#8211; I&#8217;d love to do this title with a book club. And I also particularly noticed the cricket scene &#8211; I am not a sports person, I know nothing about cricket, but I was in that scene 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: blogs.slj.com @ 2013-05-23 11:16:53 -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.slj.com/teacozy/2012/08/21/review-jasper-jones/feed/ ) in 0.07636 seconds, on May 23rd, 2013 at 3:16 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2013 at 4:16 pm UTC -->