Follow This Blog: RSS feed
A Fuse #8 Production
Inside A Fuse #8 Production

Review of the Day: Battle Bunny by Jon Scieszka and Mac Barnett

Battle Bunny
By Mac Barnett and Jon Scieszka
Illustrated by Matthew Myers
Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers
ISBN: 978- 1442446731
Ages 4-8
On shelves October 22nd

Remember Duck Amuck? I am referring of course to that old Looney Tunes short where Daffy Duck came to the realization that his fourth wall is a bit . . . faulty. Watching that short, as Daffy is being rubbed out of existence by an eraser I like to think about those kids seeing the short for the first time. Maybe amongst them there are some kids who feel this is a keen bit of transgression. Maybe some are shocked by the fact that unspoken rules are being broken left and right. Or (more likely) maybe they all just go with it. Kids get over shocks to their systems amazingly fast. But even the most jaded amongst them will have to pause for half a second as they take in the brand new picture book Battle Bunny by Jon Scieszka, Mac Barnett, and Matthew Myers. Talk about forbidden territory! Here we have a book that espouses the freedom to create over the old established (and, quite frankly, achingly poorly written) order. Parents and children have fought the disparate concepts of creativity vs. law & order since the first toddler took a crayon in a chubby little hand and created a masterpiece on the dining room walls. Battle Bunny just cranks that fight up to eleven.

Open this book and you’ll see the following inscription written in a flowery hand. “Happy Birthday, Alexander! To my little birthday bunny on his special day. Love, Gran Gran.” It quickly becomes apparent that Gran Gran’s present to Alex, a poor man’s Little Golden Book-esque bit of schlock called Birthday Bunny was evidently not doing it for her beloved grandson. The entire book looks as though it has been scribbled with a thick black pencil. These aren’t random scribbles though. Oh me, oh my, no. Alex has vastly improved what once was a limp tale about a bunny that thinks everyone has forgotten his very special day. Under Alex’s hand sentences are reworded, illustrations are updated, and the new plot concerns a bunny supervillain bent on world destruction. The only one who can stop him? A boy conveniently named Alex who is the only one with sufficient chops to take the bunny down.

Barnett has always tended to follow in the footsteps of his mentor, Mr. Scieszka, which is to be expected. He burst onto the scene a couple years ago with picture books that worked to upset the standard expectations. Guess Again mocks the guessing game picture book, Count the Monkeys does the same with counting books, and Chloe and the Lion makes fun author/illustrator collaborations. Scieszka himself is the merry jester of the form, taking picture subversion to a whole other level with books like The Stinky Cheese Man and The True Story of the Three Little Pigs. Put the two together and where does that get you? Well apparently what happens is that the two get bored with the whole fourth wall idea. Apparently it’s not GOOD enough for them anymore! They want to go bigger and bolder. They want to incorporate 21st century mash-up culture with this new generation of visual learners so as to make a book that becomes interactive in whole new ways. End result: Battle Bunny.

The selection of Matthew Myers as artist was particularly interesting to me here. He’s not a usual suspect when you think about other Scieszka and Barnett collaborations. Normally those guys are far more likely to be paired with a Lane Smith or an Adam Rex or maybe even a David Shannon. But looking at what Myers has done in the past, the choice makes a certain amount of sense. It was Myers who illustrated Erin Cabatingan’s two Musk Ox books (both titles unafraid to muck with the picture book format right there). Here he creates art that could be best described as Garth Williams meets Dav Pilkey. The meticulous level of detail is honestly insane. Even when you turn the book over and look at the back cover you can see that every single tiny bunny gracing the top of the cover has been gracefully perverted into a killer, a spy, or a fart machine. Even the first shot of the bunny hero of this book, which an initial glance would appear to be free of Alex’s shenanigans, hides a couple “improvements” here and there. Let’s just say Beatrix Potter would not approve.

It’s also hard not to enjoy a book where the creators are having such a bloody good time. What’s evident from the cover onward is how much Scieszka & Co. are enjoying their jobs. First there’s the question of coming up with a picture book plot worthy of tearing into proverbial shreds. As a children’s librarian I can assure you that the old everyone-forgot-my-birthday-oh-wait-no-they-didn’t shtick is as old as the hills and twenty times as saccharine. If Scieszka and Barnett are ever inclined to write a sequel to this I suggest they deface a story about a little bunny that wants to dance ballet but all the forest animals tell him he can’t. That would be the OTHER overdone picture book plot out there. So you’ve the subject matter as well as the actual writing and overwriting itself. The book had to be believable and the overlaid text equally so. THEN they had to get an artist on board with this madness. It had to be someone capable of drawing not just a mockery of ootsy-cutesy bunny tales, but also a realistic kid/stick drawing style. Put all those elements together and the end product works. I did find myself wishing I could see the original “Birthday Bunny” pages first, but them’s the breaks, kid.

All this begs the question: Is this book good in its own right or is this just a case of cleverness for cleverness’s sake? Because clever it most certainly is. Not just the concept itself, but the execution. But is it clever with hope that adults will ooh and ahh over the technical aspects of the form, or will kids “get it” too? According to reliable sources, the best way to read this book aloud is to read the “original” cute sections first, then follow it up with a reading of the Battle Bunny parts. That gives a really good sense of what’s being done on the page. And maybe I’m wrong about this, but this book has the potential to blow their little minds. At its best the book will do precisely what its critics most fear. It will inspire children to “improve” books, websites, photographs, and other forms of media on their own. Directed in the right way this energy could be immensely creative. After all, how far a step is it from the child who updates preexisting narratives to the child to makes up stories of their own. You heard it here first then: Battle Bunny is fan fiction for the elementary school set. Admittedly one wonders how many kids will repeatedly read Battle Bunny after the first thrill. Still, the violent storyline is enticing in its own way and certainly some readers will pore over the changes, marveling at how sentences and scenes could be changed so dramatically.

Not since The Incredible Book Eating Boy has there been a book so prone to accidental weeding in libraries nationwide. Book Eating Boy has a bite taken out of the corner of its cover, and we librarians spent half our days rescuing that title from the discard box thanks to our overly enterprising pages. Battle Bunny is doomed to suffer this same fate. Just look at it. Tell me that those unfamiliar with its cheeky subtext won’t be tossing it in the trash upon spotting it on a shelf. Pity the occasional child who will be interrogated by a clerk about how this book came to be so horribly defaced. Consider too the parents, librarians, teachers, and more who will object to this book on moral grounds. A book that encourages drawing in books? Horrors! Maybe it’s crazy that I don’t feel the same way. I dunno. Reading through it, the lesson I took away was that insipid picture books that talk down to their audiences deserve what they get. If a book doesn’t respect the child reader, kids will know and they’ll resent the book for it. Barnett and Scieszka strike that immensely difficult balance between what kids enjoy and what adults enjoy. They respect their readers’ intelligence and end up with remarkably interesting books as a result. Whether or not Battle Bunny takes off and inspires copycats or disappears without some much as a whisper remains to be seen. At the very least, it’s gonna blow a few minds. And that’s gotta be worth something right there. A pip.

On shelves October 22nd.

Source: F&G sent from publisher for review.

Notes on the Summary: Many picture books today contain one-sentence summaries of their plots on their publication pages. These are, if I am not too much mistaken, written by the fine upstanding folks at The Library of Congress. Pity then whatever poor soul it was who had to summarize this book in a single sentence. Honestly, I think they did a pretty dang good job when they wrote the following: “Alex, whose birthday it is, hijacks a story about a Birthday Bunny on his special day and turns it into a battle between a supervillain and his enemies in the forest – who, in the original story, are simply planning a surprise party.” Phew! Well played, sir or madam.

Like This? Then Try:

Interviews: Mac and Jon head on over to Seven Impossible Things Before Breakfast to explain their thought process on this one.

Misc: Monica Edinger presents an alternate way of reading this book with kids at Educating Alice.


Not even out yet and already it has its first fan video.  Impressive.

About Elizabeth Bird

Elizabeth Bird is currently the Collection Development Manager of the Evanston Public Library system and a former Materials Specialist for New York Public Library. She has served on Newbery, written for Horn Book, and has done other lovely little things that she'd love to tell you about but that she's sure you'd find more interesting to hear of in person. Her opinions are her own and do not reflect those of EPL, SLJ, or any of the other acronyms you might be able to name. Follow her on Twitter: @fuseeight.


  1. Hahaha. My first thought upon seeing the cover was, “Ooh, that looks like a Golden Library book!” Sounds like great fun even though it gives my librarian heart palpitations. Coincidentally, Screwy Decimal features a defaced book today. Seen it?

    Already have Once Upon a Motorcycle Dude on my “Never too old for picture books” shelves in my middle school library. Note to self: email LA teachers.


  2. Karen Gray Ruelle says:

    Wow, this looks terrific, Betsy, and quite hilarious! I can’t wait to read it.

  3. Melinda says:

    Oh, man, I have got to get this book.

    I think Beatrice Potter would have totally approved. After all, she slipped plenty of small subversive things into her stories. Think of The Story of a Fierce Bad Rabbit and her game-changing line: “This is a man with a gun.”

    • Elizabeth Bird says:

      Excellent point. I should really find myself a copy of that book for my home. The Tailor of Gloucester just doesn’t quite cut it for me, if you know what I mean.

  4. One of those times I wish I was in charge of the picture book collection. I don’t think the woman who is would appreciate it.

  5. Hey! My kids are in SLJ! They’ll be tickled to see their video on Fuse 8. When we got the ARC of it, straight from the horses’… Er, hands, at the Gaithersburg Book Festival, Milo literally snatched it and ran away to read it.

    I love that you are so passionate for this thing. I want coloring books, apps, pop-up video, everything we can imagine. The concept is just so powerful. And, ps, appeals to a really broad age range.

  6. About a month ago, I showed my daughter 7-Imp’s post about Battle Bunny and we ended up at Half Price books that same day so she could find a book to “improve.” She spent many happy hours turning “Love and Kisses” into “Zombie Kisses.”

    Also, you will get your wish. According to Mac Barnett, they plan to offer the unaltered “Birthday Bunny” on a website so kids can make their own versions.

  7. Great review! And I’m not just saying that because I’m the illustrator. Really well-written and thoughtful.

    Fun fact: i had to do the lettering with a pencil between the middle and ring finger of my drawing hand. I tried using my opposite hand and it was too messy. Tried using my normal grip but it was to smooth.