Subscribe to SLJ
Follow This Blog: RSS feed
Someday My Printz Will Come
Inside Someday My Printz Will Come

More Happy Than Not

coverMore Happy Than Not, Adam Silvera
Soho Teen, June 2015
Reviewed from e-ARC

This is the kind of book that can’t be discussed deeply without spoiling it. Big spoilers ahead; watch out. 

If you could forget the most painful memories of your life, would you? Maybe you’ve seen this scenario play out in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mindbut Adam Silvera’s debut novel asks much harder questions than Charlie Kaufman’s 2004 film. Personality is largely shaped by the collection of memories we carry around. If you forget certain parts of your life, will you change and will you be happier? Equally heartbreaking and fascinating, More Happy Than Not explores how forgetting can change people, and how the loss of key memories would affect a teen who was still in the process of identity formation. Given the critical praise it’s received, this is a book that would have landed on our list anyway, but the buzz before it was even published was strongly positive and mostly centered on Adam Silvera as a unique new voice in YA lit. We all know that hype can really deflate one’s experience of a book, but that was not the case here.

As the novel begins, Aaron Soto’s recovering from a suicide attempt and facing a summer without his longtime girlfriend who’s leaving to attend an art program. He’s insecure about their relationship and clearly still fragile and grieving for his father who killed himself in their home only a few months ago. He’s also surprisingly thoughtful about what he’s been through and ready to move forward. When he meets Thomas, a restless but happy dreamer, he finds a kindred spirit; someone who understands what it’s like to lose a father, and who isn’t afraid to be different. Aaron “knows” that Thomas is gay, despite Thomas never explicitly coming out or expressing interest in guys. He worries for his friend because they’ve become very close and he’s concerned about what might happen to him if they guys on the block were to find out. He and Thomas are so close that when Aaron’s girlfriend returns she is clearly jealous of their relationship. Silvera doesn’t have to spell out that Aaron is attracted to Thomas for the reader to know, even before Aaron knows it himself. He’s an unreliable narrator, but he’s emotionally honest so once he acknowledges those feelings, he tries to work through them maturely.

Halfway through the novel it seems like the main conflict is about to resolve with nowhere else to go. But then Aaron kisses Thomas and is pushed away. He’s not gay and doesn’t have anything to “figure out,” despite Aaron’s insistence that he does. It’s this heartbreak that inspires Aaron to ask his mother for a Leteo procedure.

Leteo is present in the story from the very first sentence. Aaron and other characters discuss the institute, side effects of the memory suppressing procedure, and people they know who have had it. He definitely has memories he would want to forget yet he also understands that his physical scar and the memory of the pain that led him to create it remind him to never do it again. It’s Thomas’s rejection that convinces Aaron that he needs to forget their relationship:

“I don’t want to be me. I don’t want to second-guess if my friends are going to be okay with me being me, and more importantly, I don’t want to see what happens if they’re not. I don’t want to be someone who can’t be friends with Thomas, because if there’s anything worse than not being able to be with him, it’s knowing our friendship will ultimately have an expiration date if being around him becomes impossible.” (Emphasis is my own.)

Yes, Aaron wants the Leteo procedure so he can forget that he’s gay and if Silvera wasn’t a skilled writer, this story could have been a didactic disaster. But it’s sensitive and nuanced. Aaron isn’t just upset about the violence he will potentially face; he, like any teenager who’s ever dealt with a devastating romantic rejection, can’t bear to live in a world where the man he loves doesn’t love him back. This is a really important distinction in a novel that directly addresses homophobia.

There’s a lot of homophobic language used casually throughout the novel. Every time a character says “no homo” to indicate that whatever they’ve just done isn’t gay, I cringed a little. It’s ugly and you are absolutely supposed to feel uncomfortable. It’s such a normal part of the way that Aaron communicates with his friends that there’s no need for Silvera to underline why Aaron thinks that coming out to his friends would be met with hostility. Sure enough, when his friends see him hugging Thomas, they jump him and beat him until he is pushed through a glass door and cracks his head on the ground.

This is where the novel does something adventurous and interesting. Instead of what would have been Part 3, we get Part 0: all of the memories that Aaron’s had suppressed because of course, he’s already had the Leteo procedure. There’s textual evidence to support this reveal so it feels right as you read about Aaron as a child, Aaron as a teenager, and Aaron only a few months ago when his heart was broken by a closeted basketball player. Reading this backstory is brutal because we think we know where it’s heading and then Silvera adds new wrinkles of information. This section forces the reader to re-contextualize so many events and character details that had just seemed like rich world building. Other novels have played with the timeline of their narrative and presented story out of order, but this isn’t just a stylistic choice, this serves the story and characters first.

While the inventive plot and authentic characters are this novel’s main strengths, there is so much here for a rich discussion. Do you think Adam Silvera’s debut has a shot at the RealCommittee table? Let’s get to it in the comments!

Share
About Joy Piedmont

Joy Piedmont is a librarian and technology integrator at LREI - Little Red School House & Elisabeth Irwin High School. Prior to becoming a librarian, Joy reviewed and reported for Entertainment Weekly’s PopWatch. She reviews for SLJ and is the President of the Hudson Valley Library Association. When she’s not reading or writing about YA literature, she’s compulsively consuming culture of all kinds, learning to fly (on a trapeze), and taking naps with her cat, Oliver. Find her on Twitter @InquiringJoy, email her at joy dot piedmont at gmail dot com, or follow her on Tumblr. Her opinions do not reflect the attitudes or opinions of SLJ, LREI, HVLA or any other initialisms with which she is affiliated.

Comments

  1. I am such a homer for this book–I have been talking about queer YA SF since there were essentially zero titles to talk about. And I really, really, really liked this one. You do a good job of summarizing the complexity of the decision to “stay” gay for Aaron, and it’s such a fascinating reversal of the now-traditional gay YA decision about whether to come out to friends who may not accept you, often because you’ve found someone who loves you back.

    For me, the setting and voice were also particularly strong.

    But I finished it with a feeling that there was maybe 5% of something editorial or layout or something that could’ve been done better. I can’t quite put my finger on what it was, except that I occasionally noted repetitive word choice and other things that seemed unintentional and like the kind of thing I’d expect an editor to ask about. (I didn’t keep notes because I read it as a break from my committee work!) Did other people feel similarly? Help me tease this out!

    • Joy Piedmont says:

      “But I finished it with a feeling that there was maybe 5% of something editorial or layout or something that could’ve been done better.”

      YES. I was actually just thinking about that this morning on my commute to work. I loved this book, but there’s something missing. It could be the ending; when Aaron decides not to have the Leteo procedure again (and for the right reasons) maybe more time could’ve been spent with that decision before his ante retrograde amnesia completely takes hold. I’m still working through it, but this is a novel that needs a lot of unpacking.

  2. A thousand times yes! The end of the novel originally didn’t sit well with me but after thinking about it, I came away with my own interpretation.

    I equate The Leteo to conversion therapy; there is no way to “fix,” you are who you are. I think Aaron saw his friend and what Leteo did to him, he didn’t want that and decided to accept his fate.

    I think the Printz committee takes a long look at voice and I think the fact that this isn’t a linear story; it has a chance at a nominee.

    The ultimate moral of the story for me was that everyone is dealt a set of circumstances and it doesn’t do well to dwell on our unfortunates but to find a little happiness to live another day. Teens are moody and angsty and angry and I think Aaron’s story will cause them to take a look at their lives to find some happiness somewhere.

    I really hope it wins.

  3. Tara Kehoe says:

    Thank you for this great review, Joy. I’ve been thinking over this book since I read it August! Overall, I think this book is more wonderful than well, not. I was struck by how Silvera really captured urban poverty without making Aaron’s story *about* urban poverty. My main issue (other than how brutally sad it was), was Genevieve. When all was said and done, I didn’t really understand Genevieve’s motivations for sticking with Aaron and helping him so much. What was getting out of this relationship (other than pain)? Aaron hurts her over and over again and she sticks around — as if she is his mother. Realistic for a teenage girl?

    • Joy Piedmont says:

      Genevieve’s motivation is a little opaque, but I completely bought her as a character. People convince themselves all the time that a person who isn’t loving them in the way they deserve will one day change and become perfect. For Genevieve, she’s decided that Aaron’s Leteo procedure means that they can go back to the way things were before he came out. She’s smart so we know that intellectually, she knows better, but our hearts don’t always listen to our heads. Her reaction when he comes out to her again is very telling. It’s the heartbreak of someone who could see the writing on the wall and tried to ignore it.

Leave a Reply to Kate B. Cancel reply

*